◆ New — Backtest Health Check, overfitting detection & validators for 7 platforms. See what's new →
Home / Universal Translator
New · any platform → any platform

Universal Strategy Translator

Convert a strategy between Pine Script, MetaTrader MQL, Python, NinjaScript, cTrader and EasyLanguage — or turn plain English into any of them. We translate preserving the logic, then run the output through the target platform's own validator and tell you exactly what mapped cleanly, what was approximated, and what has no equivalent. A faithful starting point to review, not a magic 1:1 port.

A faithful starting point to review — not a guaranteed 1:1 port. We validate the output and flag what doesn't map. Correctness, not profitability.

Why it's different
Validated output

Most converters hand you code and wish you luck. We run the result through the target platform's real correctness engine — you see its score and any look-ahead / repaint issues.

Honest mapping notes

Every construct is marked: maps cleanly, approximated (with the drift explained), or no equivalent — so you know exactly what to review.

No look-ahead introduced

The translation is constrained to closed-bar signals — no future indexing, no same-bar fills — and that's verified, not assumed.

Semantics first

Indicator math (Wilder's RMA, EMA seeding) and entry/exit logic are preserved, because a mistranslated strategy is a different strategy.

FAQ
What can the universal translator convert between?

Any-to-any across TradingView Pine Script, MetaTrader MQL4/MQL5, Python (backtrader/pandas), NinjaScript (NinjaTrader 8), cTrader/cAlgo, and EasyLanguage (TradeStation) — and you can start from a plain-English description into any of them. It preserves the entry/exit and indicator semantics, then validates the result.

Is the translation exact?

No tool can guarantee a 1:1 port — a mistranslated strategy is a different strategy. That's why we do two honest things: we run the translated code through the TARGET platform's own validator so you see its correctness score and any look-ahead/repaint issues, and we give per-construct mapping notes marking what carried over cleanly, what was approximated (with drift), and what has no equivalent. Always review and test before trading.

Does it introduce look-ahead bias?

The translator is instructed to never introduce look-ahead — no future indexing, no same-bar execution, signals act on closed bars — and the output is checked by our validator for exactly those problems, so you'd see them flagged.

Does a high output score mean the strategy is profitable?

No. The score measures code CORRECTNESS of the translation only. It says nothing about profitability, and nothing here is a prediction or trading advice.

Catch the bug that compiles.Validate your codeGet Pro